Preston Manning is taking a leading role in an upcoming public forum addressing Western Canada’s historical grievances with Ottawa in anticipation of Alberta’s fall referendum. The virtual discussions, scheduled for September 19 and 20, will be co-chaired by Manning, former leader of the Reform Party, and former B.C. premier Gordon Campbell.
The forum coincides with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s plan to present 10 questions to voters on October 19, including whether they support the province’s continued membership in Canada or advocate for a second referendum on separation. Manning emphasized that the aim of the events is to educate and involve voters without descending into the partisan disputes often seen in public gatherings.
He highlighted the distinctive approach of this forum compared to previous advisory panels, such as the Alberta Next panel led by Smith and the earlier Fair Deal panel in which Manning participated. The goal is to offer a broader perspective without favoring any particular viewpoint, allowing speakers to present a range of options in a non-partisan manner.
The forum’s scope extends beyond Alberta, with plans for a subsequent session in October to formulate recommendations following the referendum. These proposals will then be shared with policymakers across Western Canada, as concerns about the federal government’s role are not unique to Alberta and resonate in other provinces.
Manning stressed that the assembly aims to promote a democratic process free from partisan conflicts, providing a model for constructive dialogue often missing in legislative and parliamentary settings. He expressed hope that this initiative, particularly appealing to disillusioned young people, could revive faith in democratic institutions.
Additionally, the forum intends to draw attention to Smith’s other ballot questions, which cover various issues including restrictions on social services for certain immigrants and constitutional negotiations on Senate abolition and provincial control in appointing superior court judges. Smith has positioned these proposals as a potential compromise to address Alberta’s grievances with Ottawa, reaffirming her commitment to Alberta’s continued participation in Canada.
Manning suggested that a positive vote on the nine proposals could embolden provinces to assert their authority on federal-provincial matters, such as immigration, signaling a willingness to explore the boundaries of shared jurisdictions.