Liberal MP Shaun Chen faced online accusations of violating House rules by casting votes on legislation while in China earlier this year, following his announcement of resigning from the House of Commons. Claims circulating on social media platforms, particularly WeChat, highlighted video evidence of Chen’s visit to China coinciding with his electronic voting records in the House of Commons.
Independent journalist Andy Lee and other sources raised concerns about Chen’s voting activities while abroad, suggesting potential breaches of national security. Conservative MP John Barlow echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need for further investigation into the matter.
The allegations primarily revolved around Chen’s supposed participation in voting on Bill C-9, the government’s hate crime legislation, on March 25 while he was in China. While some suggested the possibility of video manipulation, the overarching question remained about Chen’s voting conduct outside of Canada.
House of Commons regulations explicitly forbid MPs from partaking in votes while outside the country, with strict protocols in place to verify members’ locations during voting sessions. Chen’s office clarified his travel dates to China and subsequent return to Canada before the House sitting, providing evidence of his flight itinerary and visa stamps corroborating his movements.
Chen’s resignation announcement attributed his decision to significant health concerns stemming from a past car accident, limiting his ability to travel to Ottawa regularly. Critics raised questions regarding his travel to China sponsored by the Hakka Canadian Association, emphasizing the contrasting narratives of his travel capabilities.
Amidst the controversy, scrutiny also fell on the cybersecurity implications of Chen’s trip, as detailed in correspondences with House of Commons IT staff. The Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner’s public disclosure shed light on the official nature of Chen’s trip to China, highlighting logistical details and the involvement of relevant stakeholders.