The University of Alberta is considering removing Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) from its hiring policy. This decision follows the president’s announcement last year that the university would distance itself from the term due to its divisive nature.
Currently, the university’s recruitment policy suggests giving preference to candidates from historically under-represented groups when two equally qualified candidates are considered for a position. However, a proposed draft policy heading to the board of governors for approval aims to eliminate this practice and erase any mentions of the university’s commitments to addressing employment disadvantages.
The university stated that the new policy proposal is a step towards addressing barriers faced by qualified candidates despite the current policy’s language on fair recruitment and barrier removal. While the university claims extensive consultations have been conducted on the policy since June 2025, some university members express concerns about transparency and the perceived reversal of commitments.
During a general faculties council meeting, Professor Lise Gotell, from the women’s and gender studies department, tabled a motion opposing the policy change, which was subsequently passed by the council. Gotell emphasized the importance of academic involvement in decision-making processes, expressing surprise at the lack of consultation regarding the policy change.
Kristine Smitka, vice president of the Association of Academic Staff of the University of Alberta, noted that the union was consulted on the policy but expressed concerns about the broader backlash against EDI initiatives perceived by their members.
Ajibola Adigun, a PhD student at the University of Alberta, expressed worry about the potential implications of the new policy if approved by the board of governors, highlighting the importance of upholding merit alongside equity considerations.
The university’s shift away from EDI was initiated by President Bill Flanagan a year ago, introducing the term “Access, Community and Belonging” as an alternative framework. Despite initial assurances that the university remains committed to EDI work, the current policy revision appears contradictory to this message.
Consultation notes obtained by CBC News revealed various concerns within the university community regarding the effectiveness and implementation of EDI initiatives. Some respondents expressed burnout, the need for practical resources, and the lack of representation in specific academic fields.
Speculations arose that the university’s decision could be influenced by the Mintz report, which recommended greater neutrality in post-secondary institutions to continue receiving public funding. The report highlighted concerns about silencing perspectives and hiring practices based on merit.
In response to the policy change, the government reiterated that post-secondary institutions have the authority over their internal policies and recruitment decisions. The policy revision is set to undergo approval by the board of governors in March.